Showing posts with label film. Show all posts
Showing posts with label film. Show all posts

Jul 31, 2015

Mission Impossible More & More


Mission Impossible More
Mission Impossible More
Watching Tom Cruise hurtle through the latest “Mission: Impossible,” taking one blow after another, you can’t help worrying that he won’t be able to keep this action stuff up. It looks so hard! But here he is, the 53-year-old Tom Terrific, holding onto a plane as it takes off, defying sense and gravity, and making you wonder (not for the first time) if he would actually die for our pleasure. By the time he’s flailing underwater without an oxygen tank, struggling against violent surges as breath and time run out, you can almost feel the life leaving his body.

The first “Mission: Impossible” movie, a spinoff from the 1960s television show, was released 19 years ago and was, though it’s almost hard to believe it now, something of an auteurist event, having been directed by Brian De Palma. Mr. Cruise was an established action star by 1996, but he also helped produce the first film, which strengthened his status as an international brand.

 As a star-auteur, he has always been the most important feature and effect of the series, although it’s telling that Mr. De Palma oversaw the set-piece that gave the movies their foundational image: Mr. Cruise’s operative, Ethan Hunt, hovering like a spider (or a puppet) above a luminous white floor while suspended by a very thin rope.

As the clock tick-tocks, and Ethan struggles to keep his cool — a single drop of sweat splashed on the floor would blow the operation — the visual gloss and high-tech gobbledygook, Mr. Cruise’s graceful athleticism and Mr. De Palma’s New Hollywood suspense chops flow together, turning the scene into the emblematic “Mission: Impossible” showstopper. 

It’s the kind of pure cine-spectacle that jolts you before sweeping you up. There’s never been a scene in the series as memorable as that one, even if the exploding fish tank, the film’s other eye-popper, comes close. These sequences set a high bar both for directors who followed in Mr. De Palma’s wake and for Mr. Cruise’s physical performance, which in the later installments has largely involved progressively scarier stunts.
The writer and director of the latest movie — its goofy full title is “Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation” — is Christopher McQuarrie, who’s been tethered to Mr. Cruise for the past decade. They worked together on Mr. McQuarrie’s adaptation of “Jack Reacher,” a grim genre bummer that was a bad fit for Mr. Cruise, who can rarely go tough and dark with conviction.

Mr. McQuarrie also had a hand in writing “Edge of Tomorrow,” Doug Liman’s underloved science-fiction romp that dovetailed with Mr. Cruise’s strengths, including a too infrequently tapped gift for light comedy. Mr. McQuarrie, who made his name with his rebuslike script for “The Usual Suspects,” tends to work the more lugubrious end of the entertainment spectrum, so it’s a nice surprise that “Rogue Nation” isn’t just another clenched-jaw blowout.

Sleek and bloated, specific and generic, “Rogue Nation” is pretty much like most of the “Impossible” movies in that it’s an immense machine that Mr. McQuarrie, after tinkering and oiling, has cranked up again and set humming with twists and turns, global trotting and gadgets, a crack supporting cast and a hard-working star.

Jeremy Renner, Ving Rhames and Simon Pegg (with his valuable comic timing) are all back, joined by the series newcomer Rebecca Ferguson. She plays a super-vixen, the amusingly named Ilsa Faust, who enters with the camera peeking up her skirt and rises like a half-shell Venus, à la the original Bond Girl, Ursula Andress. Even so, Ms. Ferguson has more going for her than man-throttling thighs (and an ace stunt double, Lucy Cork); she holds her own both on the ground and in midair.

Mr. Cruise looks comfortable with Ms. Ferguson, another plus. For most of his action-movie career, he has come across as a less romantically nimble, less self-amused version of Douglas Fairbanks, the swashbuckler who leaped through the silent era. Like Mr. Cruise, Fairbanks performed many of his own white-knuckle stunts, as when he climbs up the chain of a closing drawbridge in “Robin Hood.” (Fairbanks helped start United Artists, which Mr. Cruise owned a piece of for a while.) 

All too often, Mr. Cruise’s insistence on doing frightening stunts in the “Mission: Impossible” series has become its most distinguishing quality. In this movie, though, when he goes airborne like a barnstormer, the scene’s self-conscious sense of the absurd suggests he’s trying to let his inner Harold Lloyd out to play.

That helps speed up “Rogue Nation,” which slows down when the plot tangles or some ceremonial manly peacocking ensues, usually from Mr. Renner and Mr. Cruise. Clearly Mr. McQuarrie and his star feel the need to stamp the series with seriousness, something that Mr. De Palma knew better than to do. 

And throughout “Rogue Nation,” you can sense the filmmakers comfortably, at times awkwardly, playing tug of war with the mood, which grows sinister with the excellent Sean Harris as the regulation evil genius and almost frisky with Alec Baldwin as an intelligence blowhard and Tom Hollander as a political boob. Mr. Pegg’s second-banana flair is especially crucial here because it helps show that Mr. Cruise, whose smile at times seems awfully strained these days, can still take a ribbing as well as a licking.

“Mission: Impossible — Rogue Nation” is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned). Kids, don’t try this at home.


Cr.NYtimes , ข้อมูลอัพเดท ,Synergy | Facebook

Jul 29, 2015

Movie Metal Detectors

 
Movie Metal Detectors
Movie Metal Detectors

Shreveport Representative Barbara Norton says she is already working on legislation to do so. Norton says she views going to the movies as a family outing.
 
"It's a sad day in America when parents and grandparents can't be safe in a movie," says Norton.

Norton plans to introduce the measure during next year's legislative session, if re-elected this fall. She says hand-held metal detector wands start at $50, while walk-through models can cost theater owners one to two thousand dollars.

Norton says no amount of money is worth more than people's safety.
"Is my thousand dollars or fifty dollars more important than a life," says Norton. "I think not."
 
Norton feels that legislators have a responsibility to do whatever they can to make sure Louisiana residents are safe. Some think Metal Detector could scare off potential customers and increase wait times for movie goers to get to their film.

Norton says standing in line for a few minutes is a small price to pay to save lives.

Cr.WWNO ,bangkok21st ,e-news

Vacation ’58 : sweet movie


vacation-58-sweet-movie
vacation-58-sweet-movie

1. The original 1983 National Lampoon’s Vacation is a classic because deep down, it’s essentially a sweet movie. The screenplay was written by John Hughes—based off the short story “Vacation ’58,” which he wrote about a family trip to Disneyworld, and which ultimately got him on the staff of National Lampoon—and the result has his sense of goofy wonder and, despite it all, genuine affection for the Griswold family.

For everything that goes wrong on that trip, the movie (and director Harold Ramis in particular) have a legitimate love for Clark Griswold’s doomed attempts to bond with his family: The movie’s heart is always in the right place, a fractured fable about how our attempts to manufacture the Perfect Family Dynamic tend to disguise what’s truly great about our stupid, dysfunctional families in the first place. It’s also anchored by some terrific gags that might be even more off-color today than they were back then.

Imagine how “problematic” Clark forgetting to untie that dog from the bumper would be in 2015. (“Poor little guy. Probably kept up with you for a mile or so.”) Not to mention the dead Grandma on the roof. “You want me to strap her to the hood? She’ll be fine. It’s not as if it’s going to rain or something.” I’m sorry, but that’s funny.

2. Vacation—the new remake, or sequel, or whatever—takes the wrong lesson from the original. As funny as those bits with the dog and the Grandma are, they work because the rest of the movie is coated in that cracked sweetness and ultimate respect for just how insane Clark will go to make his family happy.

This new film is coated in something far more foul. Rather than putting a spin on the family comedy, this thing just doubles down on the crude, attempting to out-disgust the original and ... well, that’s it. Any sweetness is tossed out the window, any goodwill toward this family is gone. This is just about topping the scenes with the dog and the Grandma with every possible gross-out gag the filmmakers can muster.

You name it, it’s in here, from a hot-springs bath in raw sewage to a hotel bathroom with the dried blood of a recent suicide on the wall to a pedophile trucker to a seemingly unceasing number of jokes about erections. (This movie is really into erections. I counted six, three short of a starting MLB lineup of erections.) This is less a Vacation sequel than a Hangover sequel. And if you’ve even seen any of the Hangover sequels, you know that is bad news indeed.

3. The premise this time is that Rusty Griswold, one of the kids from the first Vacation (played by a young Anthony Michael Hall in the original, different actors in every sequel, and now Ed Helms as a grownup) has become a boring, rote husband who decides to recreate his father’s infamous trip to Wally World with his own wife (Christina Applegate, as usual, the funniest person in a movie that doesn’t seem to realize she’s the funniest person in the movie) and his two sons.

Of course, everything goes wrong like it did last time, only more grotesquely so. The movie follows a monotonous structure, with just one disaster set piece after another, to the point that the trip feels less like a quixotic journey and more like a purposeful death wish. None of this leads to anywhere all that interesting: Even Rusty’s decision to go to Wally World—the place where his father lost his mind, took a security guard hostage, and committed several felonies—goes curiously unexplored.

The movie just works a series of fiascos that don’t so much top each other as much as just sort of flop around next to each other. It’s the sort of movie that’s so proud of how far it’s willing to go for a joke that it forgets to make any of the jokes funny.

4. Ed Helms is a perfectly fine Rusty, I guess, but he lacks the fundamental madness that Chevy Chase brought to the role; as obnoxious and irritating as Chase can be, I’d argue he was never better than he was in the Vacation movies. Helms is less an obsessive family man than he is a total boob: He’s so neutered and ineffectual that the surprise is less that he is a boring father and more that he ever found someone to have sex with him in the first place. 

The two brothers—the younger one is always trying to kill the older one—have a few funny moments, but their one joke gets tiresome fast. But the real sign that this Vacation doesn’t quite know what it’s doing is how it wastes all its supporting talent, a list of comedic luminaries like Charlie Day, Ron Livingston, Keegan Michael-Key, Nick Kroll, Tim Heidecker, Kaitlin Olson, Michael Pena, and Leslie Mann, with nary a laugh among them. 

(Day is particularly unfunny here, moreso for how hard he’s trying.) Chris Hemsworth does his best to stretch his comedic bonafides as a hunky Texas weatherman prone to showing off his erection in his boxer-briefs, but he’s still a Marvel superhero doing his best to find laughs where there are none to be had. 

You don’t so much blame him as pity him. Oh, and Chase himself shows up and stops the movie dead in its tracks: There’s a moment where he appears to be trying some sort of physical comedy bit that isn’t so much “funny” as “like trying to watch your great-grandmother trying to do a chin-up.” It’s legitimately uncomfortable to watch him. If only Randy Quaid could have gotten out of Canada to pop in. 

5. I want to admire Vacation for his willingness to go anywhere for a joke, and the movie certainly begs the viewer to give it that benefit of the doubt. (Every scene seems to have invisible Aren’t we outrageous? subtitles at the bottom of the screen.) 

And unlike a lot of other reboots and sequels, the film is not just a blatant cynical cash-grab, or at least it is not only that; writer/directors Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley, who wrote Horrible Bosses, certainly give it their all, throwing every half-formed joke they can think of at the screen. But the whole thing is mean-spirited and ugly and awfully far from what even some of the lesser films in this franchise managed to deliver. 

It didn’t so make me angry so much as it made me sad. I bet that ends up being one of the nicer things anyone says about Vacation; I encourage them to try it out on the poster.


 Cr.Concourse ,bangkok21st ,Synergy | Facebook

Jun 25, 2015

Lexus hoverboard : Back to The Future

Lexus hoverboard : Back to The Future
Lexus hoverboard : Back to The Future
 
Lexus generated a feverish buzz online when it launched an ad campaign showing a functioning hoverboard that seems fit for Marty McFly himself.

An independent contractor designed and built the hoverboard featured in a commercial for Toyota's luxury brand.

And it works, but there's a big caveat: It only operates in a controlled environment.
Lexus said the test hoverboard in its "Amazing in Motion" campaign generates magnetic levitation by combining the effects of liquid nitrogen-cooled superconductors and permanent magnets.

In the commercial, it appears to be levitating above concrete. But that's because there are magnets underneath the surface.

The brand said it will test the hoverboard in a similarly controlled environment in Barcelona, Spain.

Lexus hoverboard : Back to The Future
Lexus hoverboard : Back to The Future
 

"It's part of an ad campaign we're filming in Spain," Durand said. "It's just a teaser."
The movie "Back to the Future 2" popularized the futuristic concept of a skateboard-like device that can hover slightly above the ground, allowing the user to glide effortlessly from place to place.

As it happens, the 1989 film depicts the hoverboard in the year 2015.
It's not the first time a major corporate brand has tried to capitalize on the interest in the futuristic 2015 portrayed in "Back to the Future 2."

Nike plans to introduce shoes with power laces later this year, a nod to the kicks that tighten automatically when Michael J. Fox's character, Marty McFly, puts them on in the film.

So, power laces are possible. But a hoverboard is not. At least for now.

The Lexus footage does illustrate, however, that it's technically feasible in a certain environment, which will surely fuel more speculation about future technological developments or more power bank inside.

"At Lexus, we constantly challenge ourselves and our partners to push the boundaries of what is possible," said Mark Templin, executive vice president of Lexus International, in a statement. "That determination, combined with our passion and expertise for design and innovation, is what led us to take on the Hoverboard project. It's the perfect example of the amazing things that can be achieved when you combine technology, design and imagination."



Cr. USA Today, bangkok21st ,เล่าสู่กันฟัง

May 27, 2015

Earthquake movie : 'San Andreas'

Earthquake movie : 'San Andreas'
Earthquake movie : 'San Andreas'

"Don't consider this your seismology course," said U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Lucy Jones, who previewed the movie this week in California.

San Andreas, the new disaster movie opening Friday, features gigantic earthquakes ripping California apart. But don't count on a lesson in accurate science.

Filled with typical Hollywood over-the-top exaggeration, it was "a lousy documentary but a good movie," Jones said. "It was better than I thought it would be."

What did it get wrong? Plenty, she said.

The movie features magnitude-9.6 and -9.1 earthquakes in California, which can't happen along the San Andreas fault, Jones said. A magnitude-8.3 quake is the upper limit that can occur along that fault, she added. Worldwide, the strongest quake ever measured was the magnitude-9.5 quake that hit Chile in 1960.

In addition, the movie features a giant quake-caused tsunami, which isn't possible on the San Andreas fault line because it is on land. An oceanic quake is needed to cause a tsunami.

The movie tsunami, which crashed over the Golden Gate Bridge, also was way too big. "You can't get a tsunami bigger than the ocean is deep," Jones said.

Other quibbles: Earthquakes can't be predicted and buildings don't explode in quakes (they collapse).

Still, Jones said there were a couple of things moviemakers got right: One earthquake can trigger another nearby, and the aftershocks in the movie were realistic.

The movie also detailed the correct actions people should take when a quake happens: "Drop, cover and hold on."

Movies are ultimately about emotions, and Jones said the filmmakers really captured that, especially the feelings of separated family members. "Not knowing if your family is OK is hard," she said. Jones said she hopes the film will spur families to develop a communication plan in case of a disaster.

San Andreas, which stars Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, opens Friday nationwide.

Cr.USA Today

Feb 1, 2015

Jurassic World & Chris Pratt In New Super Bowl Trailer

Chris Pratt Runs  In New Super Bowl Trailer
 Chris Pratt Runs For His Life In New Super Bowl Trailer


‘Jurassic World': Chris Pratt Runs For His Life In New Super Bowl Trailer


Are you ready to visit ‘Jurassic World’? In the Super Bowl spot for the new film, Chris Pratt’s life — as well as everyone else’s — life is in grave danger. Click inside to WATCH!

Chris Pratt, 35, is definitely taking on the role of a lifetime in the upcoming third Jurassic Park film, Jurassic World. In this brand-new trailer which premiered during the 2015 Super Bowl, Chris comes face-to-face with a terrifying new dinosaur who threatens mankind as we know it.

‘Jurassic World’ Trailer: Chris Pratt Faces New Dinosaur

Could you survive a day at Jurassic World? Probably not without the help of Chris Pratt.

In a brand-new trailer, a new threat has been revealed — a dinosaur created by some overeager scientists looking to create a new species.

Instead of finding a new attraction, they find themselves and their park guests running for their lives.
Will you see 'Jurassic World' in theaters?
Yes, can't wait!No, probably not.
VoteView ResultsPolldaddy.com

Thankfully, we have Owen (Pratt), to save the day with his raptors!

Here’s the film’s full synopsis below:
    Twenty-two years after the events of Jurassic Park (1993), Isla Nublar now features a fully functioning dinosaur theme park, Jurassic World, as originally envisioned by John Hammond. After 10 years of operation and visitor rates declining, in order to fulfill a corporate mandate, a new attraction is created to re-spark visitor’s interest, which backfires horribly.

Be sure to check out Jurassic World in theaters on June 12, 2015.
‘Jurassic World’s First Teaser — Nov. 2014

Just 2 months before the Super Bowl, the very first trailer for Jurassic World hit the internet.

Jurassic World 2015
Jurassic World Film


The 2-minute and 40-seconds long trailer revealed the first look at the new Jurassic Park, the place John Hammond dreamed of, 20 years after he first opened it’s doors.

It’s in that first trailer we learn about Claire creating super dinosaurs in a test tube, and it’s safe to assume that Owen is the one who saves the day.

But, how does he compare to Jeff Goldblum‘s Dr. Ian Malcolm?

What do YOU think, HollywoodLifers — Are you psyched for the next Jurassic Park film? Do you think Chris Pratt is the right guy for the franchise? Comment below!

Cr. Hollywoodlife